My autumn, sorted

I have blogged time and time and time again about the “forthcoming” publication of the Susan Kelly-edited Charters of Chertsey Abbey. Each time I have done so, the inexorable passage of time has meant its publication date is a little nearer but all the same I’ve never known for certain so much as the year in which it will appear. No longer. The book is now available for pre-order on Amazon (maybe other sites too – I haven’t checked but that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t), which of course I did immediately, and was duly informed that dispatch/delivery will take place in early October 2013. Because my excitement about this discovery and the work in question knows no bounds, I’m going to reproduce the book description in its entirety:

“This is the first complete modern edition of the early charters of Chertsey Abbey in Surrey, one of the most important of the English medieval monasteries, and one which appears to have had a nearly continuous existence from its seventh-century foundation until it was surrendered to Henry VIII’s commissioners in 1537.

“The pre-Conquest archive is fairly small and has a poor reputation; indeed, the majority of the sixteen extant charters are obvious fabrications (which have their own importance in throwing light on the later medieval history of the house). But the archive does contain ancient documents of enormous interest: a charter which has claims to be the earliest surviving Anglo-Saxon diploma; a seventh-century episcopal charter; a diploma of King Æthelred ‘the Unready’ which adds to the evidence about the development of London around the year 1000; and an authentic writ of Edward the Confessor, again referring to London.

“In this volume all the extant diplomas are expertly edited, with extensive commentaries on their content and implications. A thorough introduction comprises a new synthesis of Chertsey’s early history, discussion of the history of the archive and of the later medieval background to the fabrication of the purportedly early documents, and painstaking analysis of the history of the landed endowment. This volume also includes editions of four papal privileges said to have been obtained on the monastery’s behalf in the Anglo-Saxon period, of which two or perhaps three are genuine or have a genuine basis.”

I don’t think the importance of this book to medieval studies in Surrey can be overstated (well, save for comments of the bigger-than-Jesus ilk). Certainly, I have two or three part-completed pieces that are in a holding pattern awaiting the insights I hope, indeed expect, will derive from Kelly’s study. Chertsey was one of the biggest landholders in the medieval county, as well as its foremost “native” ecclesiastical institution. What is more, its early charters – authentic or otherwise – shed more light on pre-Conquest Surrey than any other documentary source aside from Domesday Book, as can be seen in my recent work on early medieval numismatics. To judge from Kelly’s previous editions in the Anglo-Saxon Charters series (most recently for Glastonbury, which I dropped a wad of cash on a couple of weeks back – fortunately, it has proved to be more than worth the cost) it will be a work of the utmost thoroughness and will act as the basis for much future research on Anglo-Saxon Surrey and monasteries for decades hence. The prospect of owning a copy at long last is almost enough to make me wish away the summer, but not quite. For one thing, I have the two-volume Charters of Christ Church Canterbury dropping through my letterbox at some point in the first week of July. Now that will be a real summer blockbuster…

About Robert J S Briggs

Back to being a part-time early medievalist; Surrey born, London based, been known to travel
This entry was posted in Anglo-Saxon, Charters, Chertsey, Documents, History, News, Publishing, Surrey and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to My autumn, sorted

  1. Amazon emailed me last week to notify me that the book now won’t be delivered until early January 2014. To be honest I thought the prospect of having it in my hands this autumn was too good to be true. Nevertheless, I’m quite impressed with Amazon’s message (ok, so I know it’s a mailbot and not a real person who sent it), admitting they had “fallen short” and to accept “their sincere apologies” in spite of the fact that fault more likely lies with the publishers for not sticking to the original timetable. All of this has caused me to remember I have the two volumes of the Christ Church Canterbury edition coming my way in the next few days, so it will probably be the new year before I’ve made my way through them. Happy days.

  2. Early January came and went and the book was nowhere to be seen. Then last week I received another apologetic email (though the politeness is beginning to wear a little thin) saying publication has been put back to early May this year. I haven’t the foggiest what is going on and why it won’t hit the shelves until seven months after its original release date, I guess all I can do is sit tight and wait for the spring to roll around. Unless I request an advance copy to review – I do have a Reviews tab after all…

  3. Pingback: Books on Anglo-Saxon Surrey are a lot like buses… | Surrey Medieval

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s